IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i2p420-444_6.html

Towards new labour equity: A bibliometric study of women’s happiness and well-being at work

Author

Listed:
  • Albarracín Pons, Isaac
  • Molina-Gómez, Jesús
  • Mercadé-Melé, Pere
  • Núñez-Sánchez, José M.

Abstract

The increasing participation of women in the labour market has highlighted significant advancements but also inequalities that negatively impact women’s happiness and job satisfaction. This study aims to analyse the existing literature on women’s workplace happiness through a bibliometric review, identifying trends, leading authors, research areas, and critical gaps. Employing a systematic bibliometric review methodology, 307 scientific articles published between 2010 and 2024 in the Web of Science Core Collection database were examined. Findings underscore a growing focus on factors external to the work environment, such as gender roles, double shifts, stress, and mental health. Furthermore, the results reveal considerable fragmentation in scientific production and a lack of established academic benchmarks. Conclusions stress the urgent need for organizational approaches that comprehensively address these inequalities, promoting policies of reconciliation, intersectional inclusion, and emotional well-being programmes. The study offers directions for future research and practical applications for fostering more equitable organizational management.

Suggested Citation

  • Albarracín Pons, Isaac & Molina-Gómez, Jesús & Mercadé-Melé, Pere & Núñez-Sánchez, José M., 2026. "Towards new labour equity: A bibliometric study of women’s happiness and well-being at work," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 420-444, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:420-444_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100680/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:420-444_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.