IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i2p356-389_4.html

Bridging the understanding of corporate purpose with its effectiveness: A systematic literature review and research directions

Author

Listed:
  • Tafuro, Martina
  • Piccaluga, Andrea

Abstract

The growing body of literature on corporate purpose has underscored its potential as a strategic driver for firms. However, its practical implementation remains challenging due to the concept’s multifaceted and often abstract nature. By reviewing 118 articles, this systematic literature review develops a process framework on how corporate purpose can be translated into concrete organizational strategies across three dimensions: antecedents, management, and consequences. Specifically, we identify the foundational conditions that shape a purpose statement in firms, examine how purpose is embedded and shared within them, and assess the multilevel outcomes of an effective purpose. The review highlights actionable levers to align purpose with strategy and practice, discussing how firms can implement their ‘reason why’. In doing so, the study provides contributions to better understand corporate purpose from both a theoretical and managerial perspective, within the broader field of strategic management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tafuro, Martina & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2026. "Bridging the understanding of corporate purpose with its effectiveness: A systematic literature review and research directions," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 356-389, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:356-389_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100448/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:356-389_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.