IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i1p21-54_3.html

Design and validation of an instrument for evaluating workplace happiness

Author

Listed:
  • Salazar-Altamirano, Mario Alberto
  • Galván-Vela, Esthela
  • Ravina-Ripoll, Rafael
  • Martínez-Arvizu, Orlando Josué

Abstract

Workplace happiness has emerged as a strategic and ethical priority due to its impact on employee well-being, engagement, and sustainable performance. However, the construct remains conceptually fragmented, with existing measures often limited to affect or job satisfaction. This study addresses these limitations by proposing and preliminarily validating a multidimensional instrument that integrates hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of workplace happiness: emotional well-being and purpose, work–life balance, and work relationships and support. Using a multi-phase research design, including expert content validation, a pilot study (n = 100), and large-scale psychometric testing (n = 354), the study applies exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results provide initial evidence of strong structural validity, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity (CFI = 0.971; TLI = 0.959; RMSEA = 0.078). Workplace happiness is conceptualised as a synergy of affective fulfilment, meaningful contribution, and supportive relationships. Despite cross-sectional and non-probabilistic limitations, the instrument offers a robust foundation for future validation and human-centred organisational research.

Suggested Citation

  • Salazar-Altamirano, Mario Alberto & Galván-Vela, Esthela & Ravina-Ripoll, Rafael & Martínez-Arvizu, Orlando Josué, 2026. "Design and validation of an instrument for evaluating workplace happiness," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 21-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:1:p:21-54_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100710/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:1:p:21-54_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.