IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i1p139-156_8.html

Aesthetic signals in organizational space: AI-driven visual contrast analysis of coworking and open-plan offices

Author

Listed:
  • Muskat, Birgit
  • Xia, Haiyang
  • Anand, Amitabh
  • Li, Gang
  • Tan, Adrian Heng Tsai
  • Karpen, Ingo Oswald

Abstract

This study explores the visual aesthetics of organizational space by contrasting coworking spaces with traditional open-plan offices. Drawing on signaling theory and symbolic interactionism, we examine how ambience communicates symbolic meaning. Employing an archaeological approach to retrieve large-scale online photo data from Coworker and Pinterest, we then apply AI-driven deep learning visual contrast analysis to reveal clear aesthetic distinctions in organizational space. Coworking spaces evoke a homely, dining-room-like ambiance, with artwork, plants, warmer color palettes, and a more homely and hospitable ambience. Traditional open-plan offices, by contrast, tend toward cooler colors and industrial design elements. Findings suggest that coworking spaces visually signal greater affective and sensory value, promoting belonging, creativity, and warmth. The study contributes to organizational space theory by theorizing how visual aesthetics act as symbolic cues that shape workplace experiences and by introducing a methodological framework that integrates AI-based analysis with interpretive meaning-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Muskat, Birgit & Xia, Haiyang & Anand, Amitabh & Li, Gang & Tan, Adrian Heng Tsai & Karpen, Ingo Oswald, 2026. "Aesthetic signals in organizational space: AI-driven visual contrast analysis of coworking and open-plan offices," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 139-156, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:1:p:139-156_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100618/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:1:p:139-156_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.