IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i6p2898-2925_17.html

If you take care of me, I’ll take care of you: The mutual gains of parental support for employee and organizational well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Scheuer, Cara-Lynn
  • Grotto, Angela R.
  • Doll, Jessica L.

Abstract

As the number of working parents rises, employers are increasingly called upon to support employees’ work–family (WF) obligations. Grounded in conservation of resources theory, we examined how providing varying degrees of parental support (paid vs. unpaid leave and family-supportive vs. -unsupportive leadership) is mutually beneficial to employee and organizational well-being – the ultimate criterion for organizational science. Participants (N = 538) were randomly assigned to read vignettes that varied the amount of parental support provided for expectant working parents. We tested whether WF benefits fairness perceptions moderated the indirect effects of parental support on felt obligation through job-related anxiety. Findings supported our proposed moderated-mediation model, with the most positive effects when full parental support was provided to individuals with high fairness perceptions. Our research highlights the value of providing both paid leave and family-supportive leadership, while also considering employees’ fairness perceptions, to reap the most gains of employee and organizational well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheuer, Cara-Lynn & Grotto, Angela R. & Doll, Jessica L., 2025. "If you take care of me, I’ll take care of you: The mutual gains of parental support for employee and organizational well-being," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(6), pages 2898-2925, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:6:p:2898-2925_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100485/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:6:p:2898-2925_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.