IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i6p2605-2624_3.html

Shake it off: The role of self-consciousness in dictating whether dirty work reduces satisfaction through emotional exhaustion

Author

Listed:
  • Babatunde, Sodiq O.
  • Dust, Scott
  • Fagan, Ben

Abstract

Existing research has primarily examined coping strategies for dirty work while giving less attention to employees’ satisfaction. Much of this work has considered the phenomenon from an identity perspective, despite its underlying connections to job demands and resources. Drawing on the Job Demand-Resource (JD-R) model, this study investigates the relationship between dirty work and employee satisfaction, with emotional exhaustion as a mediating variable and self-consciousness as a moderator. Data collected from 234 participants in dirty work occupations with a 4-week time lag show that dirty work is positively associated with emotional exhaustion, which negatively impacts job, career, and life satisfaction. The findings further indicate that employees with higher self-consciousness report greater emotional exhaustion, while those with lower self-consciousness experience less emotional exhaustion. These results provide theoretical contributions to the dirty work literature and offer practical implications for mitigating emotional exhaustion in these roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Babatunde, Sodiq O. & Dust, Scott & Fagan, Ben, 2025. "Shake it off: The role of self-consciousness in dictating whether dirty work reduces satisfaction through emotional exhaustion," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(6), pages 2605-2624, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:6:p:2605-2624_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100217/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:6:p:2605-2624_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.