IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i4p2176-2194_29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder salience: corporate responses during a public health crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Liou, Ru-Shiun
  • Rao-Nicholson, Rekha
  • Shang, Yanyan

Abstract

Prior crisis management research mainly studied the context of accidental and preventable crises which are generally within the organization's control, while the COVID-19 pandemic presents a public health crisis in which corporations do not have control over the extent of the impacts. Built upon the stakeholder salience framework, we propose and test the hypotheses that are derived from societal stakeholders' power, legitimacy, and urgent claims during the pandemic and reveal several corporate responses that address multiple stakeholders' interests, including customers, shareholders, community, suppliers, and employees. Specifically, corporations with a larger number of employees and social media followers tend to adopt more corporate responses that address various stakeholders' concerns. Further, in highly impacted industries, there is an increased influence of social media followers on customer-related corporate responses as well as a decreased influence of employees on employee-related corporate responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Liou, Ru-Shiun & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha & Shang, Yanyan, 2025. "Stakeholder salience: corporate responses during a public health crisis," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 2176-2194, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:2176-2194_29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000931/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:2176-2194_29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.