IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i4p2079-2097_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Chinese employees avoid seeking social support when coping with work stress?

Author

Listed:
  • Goh, Yong Wah
  • Kim, Sungmin
  • Wang, Rong
  • Goh, Pei Shan

Abstract

Organisational psychology literature is abounded with empirical evidence of the mitigating effect that social support seeking (SSS) behaviour has on stress. However, it is unclear if this phenomenon is present in a collectivist context where workers might be hesitant to seek social support when under stress. A total of 123 employees from China completed a longitudinal survey over 4 weeks assessing their appraisals of an ongoing work stressor, coping strategies, and stress level. Path-analysis, hierarchical regression and means comparison determined the degree of fit of two theoretical perspectives (stress-buffer and main effects) to Chinese employee's SSS behaviour, and its frequency of use against other coping strategies. Results showed that SSS was not elicited by primary and secondary appraisals, but instead may be better explained by employees' collectivistic aspirations. Implications of the results were addressed in relation to stress management strategies and human resource support initiatives. Future research directions were also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Goh, Yong Wah & Kim, Sungmin & Wang, Rong & Goh, Pei Shan, 2025. "Do Chinese employees avoid seeking social support when coping with work stress?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 2079-2097, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:2079-2097_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000487/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:2079-2097_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.