IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i4p1996-2018_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the relationship between work conditions and entrepreneurial behavior of employees: does employee well-being matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Escrig-Tena, Ana B.
  • Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes
  • García-Juan, Beatriz
  • Badoiu, Georgiana-Alexandra

Abstract

Do perceptions of work conditions prompt employees to adopt entrepreneurial behaviors? Does well-being play a role in this relationship? This paper proposes an integrated model of the associations between perceptions of work conditions (job resources and job demands) and the dimensions of entrepreneurial behaviors (innovative behavior, proactive behavior, and risk-taking behavior). Following the job demands-resources model, we also explore whether employees' well-being (work engagement and emotional exhaustion) mediates the association between work conditions and employees' behavior. Survey data of 257 R&D employees from the chemical sector in Spain were analyzed. The research concludes that different work conditions correlate with the dimensions of entrepreneurial behavior of employees (EBE) in different ways. Job demands are associated with innovative work behavior. Feelings of engagement are related to the dimensions of EBE and play a mediating role between job resources and EBE. Moreover, feelings of exhaustion and risk-taking behavior are connected.

Suggested Citation

  • Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Badoiu, Georgiana-Alexandra, 2025. "Examining the relationship between work conditions and entrepreneurial behavior of employees: does employee well-being matter?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 1996-2018, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:1996-2018_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000098/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:1996-2018_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.