IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i4p1737-1754_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is political skill always beneficial? The relationship between political skill and unethical pro-supervisor behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Cui, Zilong
  • Zhang, Kaixin

Abstract

By drawing on social exchange theory, we developed a theoretical model to explore the effect of political skill on unethical pro-supervisor behavior (UPSB) via leader–member exchange (LMX) and the way in which immediate supervisor empowering leadership moderates this mediated relationship. A three-wave study (n = 442) provided evidence suggesting that political skill is positively related to UPSB and that LMX partially mediates this relationship. Immediate supervisor empowering leadership moderates the effect of political skill on LMX, and political skill is positively and indirectly related to UPSB via LMX when the level of immediate supervisor empowering leadership is high. Although political skill is beneficial to both employees and organizations in many respects, our study provides empirical evidence that can improve our understanding of how political skills trigger UPSB. The practical and theoretical implications of our findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cui, Zilong & Zhang, Kaixin, 2025. "Is political skill always beneficial? The relationship between political skill and unethical pro-supervisor behavior," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 1737-1754, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:1737-1754_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367223000251/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:4:p:1737-1754_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.