IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i3p1196-1214_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical activity always benefits employees, right? Examining the role of physical activity type, grit, stress, and career satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Flinchbaugh, Carol
  • Zhou, Qin
  • Zare, Mortaza

Abstract

This study tests whether employee participation in different types of physical activity benefits employees' training stress and career satisfaction perceptions differently and if grit, as a psychological resource, mediates this relationship. In two samples, we assess whether (1) regular physical activity; or (2) exercise to reach a competitive goal have similar associations with employee outcomes. In study 1, we find no relationship between employee engagement in regular physical activity and the outcomes. Moreover, grit's consistency of effort mediates the physical activity – training stress relationship, exacerbating employees' training stress. In study 2, employee exercise reduces career satisfaction and increases training stress. Importantly, grit's perseverance dimension increases their career satisfaction, and the consistency of interest dimension lessens training stress. Thus, we find evidence that employee participation in different types of physical activity leads to divergent outcomes, and that grit as a mediator only benefits employees exercising for a competitive goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Flinchbaugh, Carol & Zhou, Qin & Zare, Mortaza, 2025. "Physical activity always benefits employees, right? Examining the role of physical activity type, grit, stress, and career satisfaction," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 1196-1214, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:1196-1214_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000219/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:1196-1214_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.