IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i2p910-928_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace ostracism and team members’ creativity: The mediating role of self-reflection and moderating role of high-involvement work practices

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhining
  • Guan, Chunjie
  • Ren, Shuang
  • Cai, Shaohan

Abstract

Drawing on social cognitive theory, this paper examines whether self-reflection mediates the association between workplace ostracism and team members’ creativity, and whether this mediating effect is moderated by high-involvement work practices (HIWPs). We construct and test a cross-level model using multilevel path analysis to analyse data collected from 81 teams (a total of 393 members) in China. The results show that workplace ostracism negatively influences team members’ reflection but positively influences rumination, which in turn affects individual creativity. Furthermore, HIWPs negatively moderate the effects of workplace ostracism on self-reflection, and moderate the linkages among workplace ostracism, reflection/rumination and team members’ creativity. Finally, theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhining & Guan, Chunjie & Ren, Shuang & Cai, Shaohan, 2025. "Workplace ostracism and team members’ creativity: The mediating role of self-reflection and moderating role of high-involvement work practices," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 910-928, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:910-928_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000220/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:910-928_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.