IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v31y2025i2p533-550_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From bad to worse: Follower reactions to escalating unethical behaviors of leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Waples, Ethan P.
  • Osburn, Holly K.
  • Leon, Matthew
  • McKee, Victoria P.

Abstract

The present study focuses on the Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Theory of leadership, examining how sensemaking mitigates follower reactions after unethical leader behavior. We examine the impact of ethical misconduct type on follower outcomes, specifically whether CIP leaders are able to justify unethical behavior to maintain follower attitudes toward the leader. Participants assumed the role of an employee for a fictional oil and gas exploration company, encountering the company’s C, I, or P chief executive officer (CEO) through a video-taped speech discussing the state and vision of the organization. Participants read ethical misconduct related to “people” or ethical misconduct related to “tasks or resources” by the organization’s CEO. Finally, participants were provided (or not provided) a video-taped justification of the ethical misconduct. A three-way interaction revealed the impact of ethical misconduct type is key to leader sensemaking. Implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Waples, Ethan P. & Osburn, Holly K. & Leon, Matthew & McKee, Victoria P., 2025. "From bad to worse: Follower reactions to escalating unethical behaviors of leaders," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 533-550, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:533-550_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367224000804/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:533-550_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.