IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p2300-2317_34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmasking the interplay between gaslighting and job embeddedness: The critical roles of coworker support and work motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Farid, Hasan
  • Zhang, Yang
  • Tian, Ming
  • Lu, Shiyao

Abstract

Until now the research has mainly examined visible abusive supervision, like aggression and violence, but it’s unclear how subtle forms, such as gaslighting, impact victims. Gaslighting, an emotionally and psychologically manipulative form of abuse, is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon in contemporary times. Based on the conservation of resources theory, we examined how supervisory gaslighting affects job embeddedness directly and indirectly through work motivation. We also explored how coworker support moderates the gaslighting-work motivation link. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the two-wave time-lagged data from 337 Chinese hotel employees. The results show the negative direct and indirect effects of gaslighting, and coworker support moderates the negative link between gaslighting and work motivation. Hotel organizations should exercise caution when hiring supervisors to prevent gaslighting, which can undermine employee motivation and job embeddedness. This study also recommends raising awareness among employees to speak out against supervisors’ gaslighting behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Farid, Hasan & Zhang, Yang & Tian, Ming & Lu, Shiyao, 2024. "Unmasking the interplay between gaslighting and job embeddedness: The critical roles of coworker support and work motivation," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 2300-2317, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2300-2317_34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367224000634/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2300-2317_34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.