IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p2126-2148_27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining firefighter and police officers’ trust and service quality: What resources matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Flinchbaugh, Carol
  • Miles, Jennifer
  • Javadizadeh, Bahareh
  • Liang, Yanni
  • Smith, William L.

Abstract

We present and test a model examining the role of organizational and psychological resources that enable employees’ high-quality service provision in public safety jobs. Through a two-study design conceptualized in the principle of reciprocity of social exchange theory, we recruited 120 firefighters and 119 police officers and found that service quality was positively associated with their trust in the administration, training, and staffing sufficiency. We also found that police officers’ prosocial motivation, as a psychological resource, amplifies the relationship between trust in administration and service quality. The beneficial role of prosocial motivation in police officers’ service quality appears to counter recent research suggesting that prosocial motivation has a dark side in demanding contexts. Our findings contribute to and highlight essential connections between distinct resources that positively impact the service quality of firefighters and police officers in dangerous and emotionally demanding job roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Flinchbaugh, Carol & Miles, Jennifer & Javadizadeh, Bahareh & Liang, Yanni & Smith, William L., 2024. "Examining firefighter and police officers’ trust and service quality: What resources matter?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 2126-2148, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2126-2148_27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S183336722300069X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2126-2148_27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.