IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p1936-1958_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Showing commitment or incompetence? When and how newcomers' information seeking elevates (degrades) task-related outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Hui
  • Zhang, Yihua
  • Wu, Shaoxue
  • Wu, Wenbing
  • Ni, Dan
  • Zhang, Xiaoyan

Abstract

To date, empirical research exploring the complex mechanisms of when and how information seeking from supervisor affects newcomers' task-related outcomes remains in its infancy. With a sample of 394 newcomers and their supervisors, drawing on the conservation of resources theory and professional image construction theory, we proposed and confirmed two paradoxical paths regarding perceptions of professional image construction – concern about impairing competence-image and confidence in improving commitment-image – that connect newcomers' information seeking from supervisor with their emotional exhaustion during socialization and ultimately can elevate and degrade their task-related outcomes, respectively. In addition, we found that supervisors' favorable feedback weakened the relationship between information seeking from supervisor and competence-image impairment concern, whereas it strengthened the linkage between information seeking and commitment-image improvement confidence. This study thus provides a more comprehensive picture for scholars and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Hui & Zhang, Yihua & Wu, Shaoxue & Wu, Wenbing & Ni, Dan & Zhang, Xiaoyan, 2024. "Showing commitment or incompetence? When and how newcomers' information seeking elevates (degrades) task-related outcomes," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 1936-1958, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1936-1958_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000918/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1936-1958_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.