IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p1748-1771_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the talk match the walk?: Effects of leader exemplification and ethical conduct on perceived leader authenticity, trust, and organizational advocacy

Author

Listed:
  • Gardner, William L.
  • Clapp-Smith, Rachel
  • Mhatre, Ketan
  • Avolio, Bruce J.
  • Chan, Adrian
  • Hughes, Larry W.
  • Pandey, Pavas
  • Sun, Iris

Abstract

Leader exemplification involves implicit and explicit claims of high moral values made by a leader. We employed a 2 × 3 experimental design with samples of 265 students in Study 1 and 142 working adults in Study 2 to examine the effects of leader exemplification (exemplification versus no exemplification) and ethical conduct (self-serving, self-sacrificial, and self-other focus) on perceived leader authenticity, trust in leader, and organizational advocacy. In Study 1, we found that exemplification produced elevated levels of perceived authenticity, trust, and advocacy in the form of employment and investment recommendations. We also showed that leader ethical conduct moderated this effect, as ratings were highest following a leader’s self-sacrificial conduct, lowest for self-serving conduct, and moderate for conduct reflecting self-other concerns. In Study 2, we replicated these findings for perceived authenticity and trust, but not organizational advocacy, which yielded mixed results. The leadership implications and future research directions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardner, William L. & Clapp-Smith, Rachel & Mhatre, Ketan & Avolio, Bruce J. & Chan, Adrian & Hughes, Larry W. & Pandey, Pavas & Sun, Iris, 2024. "Does the talk match the walk?: Effects of leader exemplification and ethical conduct on perceived leader authenticity, trust, and organizational advocacy," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 1748-1771, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1748-1771_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367224000671/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1748-1771_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.