IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i5p1408-1425_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Furlough and its effects on employees after returning to work: the roles of psychological contract breach and violation, and perceived organizational support

Author

Listed:
  • Delegach, Marianna
  • Klein, Galit
  • Katz-Navon, Tal

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about changes in the working world. One of the main strategies to cope with the economic situation during lockdowns was to furlough employees. In the current study, we propose that psychological contract breach and violation between the organization and the furloughed employee act as underlying mechanisms that explain the relationship between the employees' furlough status and the increase in their emotional exhaustion and decrease in affective commitment. Furthermore, we suggest that perceived organizational support can act as a buffer that attenuates the association between furloughed employment status and perceived contract breach. The study was conducted at two points in time: during the first lockdown and 4 months afterward (N = 336). Results supported the predicted indirect sequential associations. However, perceived organizational support served to buffer the relationship between furloughed employment status and perceived psychological contract breach only in the case of employees who continued to work.

Suggested Citation

  • Delegach, Marianna & Klein, Galit & Katz-Navon, Tal, 2024. "Furlough and its effects on employees after returning to work: the roles of psychological contract breach and violation, and perceived organizational support," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 1408-1425, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1408-1425_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000712/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1408-1425_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.