IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i2p269-286_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational dilemmas in safety-critical industries: The tension between organizational reputational concerns and the effective communication of risk

Author

Listed:
  • Ambituuni, Ambisisi
  • Ejiogu, Chibuzo
  • Ejiogu, Amanze
  • Omar, Maktoba

Abstract

Organizations involved in safety-critical operations often deal with operational tensions, especially when involved in safety-critical incidents that is likely to violate safety. In this paper, we set out to understand how the disclosures of safety-critical incidents take place in the face of reputational tension. Based on the case of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), we draw on image repair theory and information manipulation theory and adopt discourse analysis as a method of analyzing safety-critical incident press releases and reports from the NNPC. We found NNPC deploying image repair as part of incident disclosures to deflect attention, evade blame and avoid issuing apologies. This is supported by the violation of the conversational maxims. The paper provides a theoretical model for discursively assessing the practices of incident information disclosure by an organization in the face of reputational tension, and further assesses the risk communication implications of such practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Ejiogu, Chibuzo & Ejiogu, Amanze & Omar, Maktoba, 2024. "Operational dilemmas in safety-critical industries: The tension between organizational reputational concerns and the effective communication of risk," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 269-286, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:2:p:269-286_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367219000270/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:2:p:269-286_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.