IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v27y2021i4p809-829_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The multi-criteria analysis of corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of Russia, Bulgaria and Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Stojanović, Anđelka
  • Mihajlović, Ivan
  • Safronova, Natalia B.
  • Kunev, Svilen
  • Schulte, Peter

Abstract

Cross-cultural research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) dealing with specific stakeholder groups is fairly rare in the existing literature. The aim of this research is to investigate the level of recognition of CSR in companies by employees working in micro/small, medium-sized and large companies. The research is based on the survey conducted in Bulgaria, Russia and Serbia with the employees' attitudes obtained via a structured questionnaire. A similar socio-historical background of the three countries and different levels of accomplished socio-economic development at present is taken into account. A proposed ranking methodology was based on the multi-criteria decision analysis approach, observed through five studied dimensions: environmental, social, economic, stakeholder and voluntariness. The ranking was carried out using the integrated Entropy-PROMETHEE-GAIA method, where the Entropy method was used for determining the weights of the criteria, whereas PROMETHEE-GAIA was used for final ranking. The obtained results were analyzed from the multi-cultural point of view and show more significant differences in the attitudes of employees from different countries, rather than when the size of a company is taken into consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Stojanović, Anđelka & Mihajlović, Ivan & Safronova, Natalia B. & Kunev, Svilen & Schulte, Peter, 2021. "The multi-criteria analysis of corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of Russia, Bulgaria and Serbia," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 809-829, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:809-829_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367220000401/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:809-829_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.