IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v27y2021i3p481-506_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational antecedents to designing a comprehensive complaint management system

Author

Listed:
  • S.Phabmixay, Chanthaly
  • Rodríguez-Escudero, Ana I
  • Rodríguez-Pinto, Javier

Abstract

The literature highlights two main approaches to designing an effective complaint management system: the mechanistic and the organic. The mechanistic approach emphasizes the establishment of guidelines for the correct processing, attention and resolution of complaints received. In contrast, the organic approach relies on creating a supportive internal environment for correct customer attention, made possible through training and empowering employees responsible for complaint management and by promoting extra-role behaviour among them. The present research aims to study the antecedents of adopting these two approaches. From a strategic perspective, we analyse the influence of organizational culture variables (the extent to which the firm is customer and innovation oriented) and the nature of the objectives pursued by complaint handling (defensive vs. improvement objectives). The proposed model is tested on a sample of 140 manufacturing firms. Findings indicate these antecedents shape the complaint management system in a diverse and significant manner.

Suggested Citation

  • S.Phabmixay, Chanthaly & Rodríguez-Escudero, Ana I & Rodríguez-Pinto, Javier, 2021. "Organizational antecedents to designing a comprehensive complaint management system," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 481-506, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:481-506_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367218000731/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:481-506_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.