IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v25y2019i02p211-223_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collectivism-oriented HRM and individual creative contribution: The roles of value congruence and task interdependence

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Silu
  • Zhang, Guanglei
  • Jiang, Wanxing
  • Shi, Shengping
  • Liu, Tao

Abstract

This study deals with the issue whether collectivism-oriented human resource management (HRM) system influences individual creative contribution to research teams in particular in an Asia-Pacific context. It is argued that, given certain environmental factors, such as high person-organization value congruence among team members and task interdependence, the collectivism-oriented HRM system should have a positive effect on individual creative contribution to the research teams. A multi-level theoretical model is proposed accordingly, which is then tested with data from 40 research teams and 168 individuals in Chinese universities. The results demonstrated that collectivism-oriented HRM helps to enhance individual creative contribution through the path of value congruence. Moreover, the relationship between value congruence and individual creative contribution was moderated by task interdependence. These findings offer novel insight into how an organization can develop its HRM system and improve individual creative contribution in research teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Silu & Zhang, Guanglei & Jiang, Wanxing & Shi, Shengping & Liu, Tao, 2019. "Collectivism-oriented HRM and individual creative contribution: The roles of value congruence and task interdependence," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 211-223, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:25:y:2019:i:02:p:211-223_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367216000687/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:25:y:2019:i:02:p:211-223_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.