IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v23y2017i03p423-436_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of supervisor–subordinate relationships and a trainee characteristic upon police officer work outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Brunetto, Yvonne
  • Teo, Stephen
  • Shacklock, Kate
  • Farr-Wharton, Rod
  • Shriberg, Art

Abstract

This study used two theoretical lenses (positive organizational behaviour and social exchange theory) to examine the influence of an individual attribute – psychological capital (PsyCap), and an organizational factor – leader–member exchange, upon police officers’ perceptions of learning options (teamwork and training) and affective commitment. A cross-sectional design using a survey-based, self-report strategy was used to collect data from 588 frontline police officers in the United States. The findings indicate that leader–member exchange explained almost a fifth of PsyCap and together leader–member exchange and PsyCap accounted for almost a third of police officers’ satisfaction with training. Further, leader–member exchange, PsyCap, training and teamwork collectively explain almost half of affective commitment. One implication of the findings is that if senior management want police officers to be more committed, they have to improve officers’ relationships with their supervisors, upskill them (especially their supervisors) in PsyCap, and improve teamwork opportunities and processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunetto, Yvonne & Teo, Stephen & Shacklock, Kate & Farr-Wharton, Rod & Shriberg, Art, 2017. "The impact of supervisor–subordinate relationships and a trainee characteristic upon police officer work outcomes," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 423-436, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:23:y:2017:i:03:p:423-436_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367216000274/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:23:y:2017:i:03:p:423-436_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.