IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v22y2016i01p1-18_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to incident-reporting behavior among nursing staff: A study based on the theory of planned behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Yi-Hsuan
  • Yang, Cheng-Chia
  • Chen, Te-Tsung

Abstract

Previous studies have identified numerous factors that affect incident-reporting behavior. However, few studies have applied an individual psychology perspective to identify and examine the factors affecting the intention of nursing staff to report incidents. We integrate the theory of planned behavior, organizational behavior, psychological behavior, and social exchange theory to identify which factors affect the intentions of nursing staff to report incidents. Samples were collected from nursing staff at 40 regional or larger hospitals for model verification. The results of this study show that psychological safety, attitude toward reporting incidents, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control correlate positively with the intention to report incidents. The perceived cost and perceived benefit of incident reporting directly affects the attitude toward incident-reporting behavior, and self-efficacy influences perceived behavioral control. Furthermore, subjective norms and the perceived benefits of incident reporting mediate the effect of psychological safety on attitude toward incident-reporting behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Yi-Hsuan & Yang, Cheng-Chia & Chen, Te-Tsung, 2016. "Barriers to incident-reporting behavior among nursing staff: A study based on the theory of planned behavior," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:01:p:1-18_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367215000085/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:01:p:1-18_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.