IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v19y2013i03p338-351_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employing graduates: Selection criteria and practice in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar, Fiona
  • Cathro, Virginia
  • Harrison, Sean
  • Hoek, Janneke
  • McKenzie, Katherine
  • Malcolm, Ngaire
  • Polson, Sarah
  • Porteous, Matthew
  • Robertson, Samantha
  • Shewan, Philippa
  • Smart, Jessica
  • Tyler-Baxter, Seamus

Abstract

Entry into graduate programmes is highly competitive. Although careers advisors working within higher education do their best to prepare students for engagement with these programmes; anecdotal reports suggest many graduates remain unsure what it is these employers are seeking, and how it is assessed. Our study examines both selection criteria profiles and practices, drawing comprehensive data from 20 New Zealand firms and finds that regardless of a firm's characteristics, most seek a very similar graduate profile, with the concepts of candidate ‘well roundedness’ and ‘fit’ considered most vital. Selection practices employed are tightly connected to this graduate profile. These findings shed some much needed light for graduates on what is, but also what is not, highly sought after by employers in the recruitment and selection process. They should also be of benefit to universities by assisting them to better prepare their graduates for successful transition into the employment market.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar, Fiona & Cathro, Virginia & Harrison, Sean & Hoek, Janneke & McKenzie, Katherine & Malcolm, Ngaire & Polson, Sarah & Porteous, Matthew & Robertson, Samantha & Shewan, Philippa & Smart, Jessica &, 2013. "Employing graduates: Selection criteria and practice in New Zealand," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 338-351, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:19:y:2013:i:03:p:338-351_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1839352713000252/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivana Tadić & Branka Marasović & Ivana Jerković, 2022. "Fuzzy multicriteria model to support decision making during the selection process of teaching and research staff in higher education," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 867-885, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:19:y:2013:i:03:p:338-351_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.