IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v18y2012i01p36-52_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative planning and its antecedents: An assessment in supply chain relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Guenter, Hannes
  • Grote, Gudela

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the interactive effects of individual work autonomy and interdependence on collaborative planning, building on the distinction of task and outcome interdependence. Using a questionnaire study, we assess collaborative planning and its antecedents in supply chain relationships, incorporating the forestry and timber industry. While no interactive effects hold for task interdependence, outcome interdependence only facilitates collaborative planning for individuals with low work autonomy. Individuals with high autonomy always invest in collaborative planning. This study provides a picture of supply chain reality more complete than that sketched in studies that have assessed interdependence as a one-dimensional construct and alludes to the importance, often overlooked, of work autonomy in supply chain relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Guenter, Hannes & Grote, Gudela, 2012. "Collaborative planning and its antecedents: An assessment in supply chain relationships," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 36-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:18:y:2012:i:01:p:36-52_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S183336720000105X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:18:y:2012:i:01:p:36-52_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.