IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v46y2026i1p21-49_2.html

Beyond NIMBY-ism: rethinking acceptance of housing densification in a direct democratic renters society

Author

Listed:
  • Wehr, Malte
  • Wicki, Michael L.
  • Wittwer, Stefan
  • Kaufmann, David

Abstract

Housing affordability presents a pressing global issue. While there is a growing need for more urban housing, implementation and regulation of housing densification is highly controversial, especially in Switzerland, where local referendums can delay urban development. The article examines residents’ acceptance of housing densification through a three-step research design, utilizing original experimental survey data and combining stated and experimental behavior with subgroup heterogeneity analysis from 3,497 residents across 162 Swiss cities and towns. Findings show acceptance of housing densification to be influenced by individuals’ relative housing costs, perceived neighborhood density, and political ideology; by social and ecological policy instruments; and between subgroups on socio-economic and ideological grounds. Ultimately, results highlight a broad coalition supporting densification to provide affordable housing and address ecological concerns, offering insights for policymakers. Studying residents’ opinions and behaviors within a direct democratic system and renters society further contributes to advancing theoretical understanding of housing politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Wehr, Malte & Wicki, Michael L. & Wittwer, Stefan & Kaufmann, David, 2026. "Beyond NIMBY-ism: rethinking acceptance of housing densification in a direct democratic renters society," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 21-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:21-49_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25100883/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:21-49_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.