IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v46y2026i1p170-186_8.html

How proximity and trust of policy narrators motivate their audience

Author

Listed:
  • Shanahan, Elizabeth A.
  • DeLeo, Rob A.
  • Anderson, Deserai
  • Taylor, Kristin
  • Birkland, Thomas A.
  • Chow, Clifton M.
  • Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
  • Minkowitz, Honey
  • Koebele, Elizabeth A.

Abstract

The effect of the narrator is understudied in the Narrative Policy Framework. We offer a systematic approach that details narrator definition, features (proximity to audience), and functions (audience trust). Informed by Construal Level Theory, we conducted an exploratory study (n = 2268) that assigned proximal to distal narrator features (“your friend,” “your doctor,” “the CDC,” and a control “someone”) and affixed narrators to visual messages about getting the COVID-19 vaccine. We investigated the extent to which proximity, trust, and congruence between narrator and narrative form predicts motivation to vaccinate. Narrator alone had no significant effect, but the proximal narrator paired with proximal characters in the policy message did have significant effects on motivation to vaccinate. Individual trust of distal narrators elicits affective responses, whereas individual trust of the proximal narrator is associated with motivation. These results suggest effects of narrator feature, characteristic, and function are dynamic and contextual.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanahan, Elizabeth A. & DeLeo, Rob A. & Anderson, Deserai & Taylor, Kristin & Birkland, Thomas A. & Chow, Clifton M. & Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle & Minkowitz, Honey & Koebele, Elizabeth A., 2026. "How proximity and trust of policy narrators motivate their audience," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 170-186, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:170-186_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25100937/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:170-186_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.