IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v46y2026i1p1-20_1.html

Taxing your cake and growing it too: public beliefs on the dual benefits of progressive taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Becker, Bastian
  • Castanho Silva, Bruno
  • Lierse, Hanna

Abstract

Political and economic elites often warn that taxes on the rich impair economic growth. Although such warnings have a long tradition in elite discourse, what the public believes about the effects of progressive taxation remains surprisingly understudied. This omission limits our understanding of a basic democratic mechanism, the congruence of elite and public opinion. To close this gap, we employ a conjoint experiment during the 2021 German national election on a representative quota sample. Participants compare policy packages that entail changes in income, inheritance, and corporate taxes and evaluate their impact on equality and growth. We find no evidence that the public believes that progressive taxes promote equality at the expense of growth. Instead, participants believe that progressive taxes are doubly beneficial, promoting both outcomes. Furthermore, such beliefs do not vary by ideology or economic status. Our findings suggest a more consensual view of progressive taxation that emphasizes positive synergies between economic growth and greater equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Becker, Bastian & Castanho Silva, Bruno & Lierse, Hanna, 2026. "Taxing your cake and growing it too: public beliefs on the dual benefits of progressive taxation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:1-20_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25100858/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:1-20_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.