IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v45y2025i3p522-546_6.html

Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Simstich, Anna

Abstract

When implementing EU policies, national policy bureaucracies often face a goal conflict when national policy preferences are not aligned with the EU policy and they are granted little discretion in implementation: While customized implementation allows them to adjust EU policies to the national context, it also risks noncompliance with EU law and blame for unpopular EU policies. This bureaucratic politics perspective has received little attention in institutionalist and interest-based explanations of customized implementation. With a bureaucratic politics approach, this article argues that national governments pursue strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking when confronted with high goal conflict between timely and correct implementation and substantive (national) policy goals. This argument is illustrated in a comparative case study on the implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany. This article identifies bureaucratic strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking as an underlying mechanism of customized implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Simstich, Anna, 2025. "Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 522-546, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:522-546_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X2500011X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:522-546_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.