IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v45y2025i3p449-473_3.html

Factors facilitating the adoption of wellbeing budgets in New Zealand: a case study with budget actors

Author

Listed:
  • Ortynsky, Stephanie
  • Farag, Marwa
  • Mou, Haizhen

Abstract

New Zealand made international waves when it implemented a wellbeing budget in 2019. We investigated the factors which facilitated the adoption of this novel budgeting policy. In interviews with 22 key informants from New Zealand’s central government, most interviewees (90% and over) emphasized the impact of politics, internal direction, and the international policy environment as key factors of effect on the formulation and adoption of wellbeing budgeting. Results of our study add new insights to Good’s theory that predicts similar motivations and behaviors to be expected from groups of budget actors who inhabit monolithic roles of politicians, treasury officials, and ministerial bureaucrats. Rather, even with inherent tensions within budget actor groups, they can be positioned to debate differing approaches that lead to the aim of adopting innovative policy. Wellbeing budgetary reform may be undertaken with a combination of legislation, fostering public sector debate, and responding to global conditions of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortynsky, Stephanie & Farag, Marwa & Mou, Haizhen, 2025. "Factors facilitating the adoption of wellbeing budgets in New Zealand: a case study with budget actors," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 449-473, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:449-473_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25000078/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:449-473_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.