IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v45y2025i2p349-371_7.html

Authority vs. incentives: examining the effects of policy tools on municipal solid waste policy performance in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Seejeen
  • Cho, Yoon Jik

Abstract

The research seeks to compare the effects of authority and incentive tools, in the environmental policy field. To compare their effects, this research analyzes South Korea’s municipal solid waste (MSW) recycling policy, which incorporates both tools. Specifically, the policy uses one authority tool (government monitoring for illegal dumping) and two incentive tools (monetary reward for reporting illegal dumping and community recycling challenge). We conducted panel-corrected standard error regression and seemingly unrelated regression analyses by using time-series cross-sectional data of the MSW and volume-based waste fee systems of 25 local governments from 2006 to 2019. The results demonstrate that the authority tool effectively achieves the policy goal. Incentive tools showed mixed results as monetary reward significantly increased MSW policy performance, whereas community recycling challenge policy alone was not significantly associated with all dependent variables. When both incentive tools were adopted, MSW policy performance was improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Seejeen & Cho, Yoon Jik, 2025. "Authority vs. incentives: examining the effects of policy tools on municipal solid waste policy performance in South Korea," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 349-371, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:349-371_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25000091/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:349-371_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.