IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v45y2025i2p321-348_6.html

A hard pill to swallow: Social capital, opiates, and health outcomes in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Hawes, Daniel P.
  • McCrea, Austin Michael

Abstract

Over the last decade, the USA experienced an unprecedented opioid crisis. While there are myriad causes for this crisis, here we examine how social capital shapes the public’s demand for opioids and the government’s responses to the crisis. First, we posit that communities with higher levels of social capital are associated with lower rates of opioid use/abuse. Second, we posit that higher levels of social capital will be associated with a more robust public response in providing necessary resources to address substance abuse resulting in lower rates of drug-related deaths. Using county-level data from the USA, we find support for an indirect relationship where social capital is associated with higher levels of community support for drug treatment, which, in turn, is associated with lower drug-related deaths and deaths of despair.

Suggested Citation

  • Hawes, Daniel P. & McCrea, Austin Michael, 2025. "A hard pill to swallow: Social capital, opiates, and health outcomes in the United States," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 321-348, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:321-348_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X24000308/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:321-348_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.