IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v45y2025i2p270-292_4.html

Does multilevel government increase legitimacy? Citizens’ preferences for subnational authority and acceptance of governmental decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Alıca, Berkay
  • Schakel, Arjan H.

Abstract

Despite a trend of increasing multilevel government across the globe, there are surprisingly few studies on public support for decisions taken by different government levels. Decentralization is likely to boost government support because it increases congruence between citizens and their representatives. We argue that citizens’ preferences for subnational authority are key for their willingness to accept governmental decisions. Citizens who prefer decentralization are more supportive of subnational decisions, and their support for national decisions increases when subnational governments are involved in the decision-making process. We fielded a survey that asked 1,855 Norwegian respondents their willingness to accept decisions taken by their municipality, county, and national government to close an educational institution in their municipality. We find substantial empirical evidence for our hypotheses. Norway is a least-likely-case because government tiers enjoy high levels of trust. Therefore, the results have also important implications for the legitimacy of multilevel government in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Alıca, Berkay & Schakel, Arjan H., 2025. "Does multilevel government increase legitimacy? Citizens’ preferences for subnational authority and acceptance of governmental decisions," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 270-292, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:270-292_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X25000066/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:45:y:2025:i:2:p:270-292_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.