IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v44y2024i4p767-784_5.html

Authoritarian and democratic states: the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of public health outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ha, Hyesong
  • Knox, Colin
  • Janenova, Saltanat

Abstract

There is a populist narrative that authoritarian regimes were better able to respond to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic because of their strict enforcement powers, compliance of citizens, and speed of autocratic decision-making in a crisis. Research evidence to date on this assertion is however inconclusive or inconsistent. This paper analyses data from democratic and authoritarian countries with the aim of finding out whether autocratic regimes, using greater stringency measures (policy interventions to tackle COVID-19), had better public health outcomes than their counterparts. The results show that authoritarian regimes performed better in tackling the pandemic in terms of infection and death rates than their counterparts. However, we did not find any empirical evidence on the moderation effect of trust in government on the relationship between stringency measures against COVID-19 and policy outcomes. This result might be due to the lack of data transparency in authoritarian countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha, Hyesong & Knox, Colin & Janenova, Saltanat, 2024. "Authoritarian and democratic states: the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of public health outcomes," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 767-784, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:4:p:767-784_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X24000163/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:4:p:767-784_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.