IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v43y2023i2p261-283_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of psychological bias on public officials’ attitudes towards the implementation of policy instruments: evidence from survey experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Bingsheng
  • Qin, Zengqiang
  • Zhang, Jinfeng

Abstract

As implementers, public officials have historically enjoyed substantial influence in the public policy process, but little attention has been paid to the effect of psychological elements on their attitudes towards implementing policy instruments. The authors argue that from a behavioural public administration perspective, public officials’ attitudes towards implementing certain policy instruments are not rational, but instead biased. Using two survey experiments on 1,024 Chinese public officials, this study examines the cognitive and motivational bias of public officials’ attitudes towards implementing policy instruments. The findings indicate that when public officials are presented with risk information in a negative framing, they are more reluctant to implement indirect policy instruments than direct ones, and this phenomenon becomes more pronounced when their public interest orientation is activated, rather than their personal interest orientation. The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of the effect of psychological biases on public officials’ attitudes towards policy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Bingsheng & Qin, Zengqiang & Zhang, Jinfeng, 2023. "The effect of psychological bias on public officials’ attitudes towards the implementation of policy instruments: evidence from survey experiments," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 261-283, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:43:y:2023:i:2:p:261-283_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X22000319/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:43:y:2023:i:2:p:261-283_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.