IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v43y2023i2p240-260_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The policy agenda effects of problem indicators: a comparative study in seven countries

Author

Listed:
  • Kristensen, Thomas Artmann
  • Mortensen, Peter Bjerre
  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer
  • Seeberg, Henrik Bech

Abstract

Indicators are important sources of information about problems across many policy areas. However, despite a growing number of indicators across most policy areas, such as health care, business promotion, or environmental protection, we still know little about if, how, and when such indicators affect the policy agenda. This article develops a theoretical answer to these questions and examines the implications using a new large-n dataset with 220,000 parliamentary questions asked by government and opposition MPs in Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The data contain information on political attention to 17 problems, such as unemployment, C02 emission, and crime from 1960 to 2015. Across this wealth of data, the article demonstrates that politicians respond to the severity and development of problem indicators over time and in comparison to other countries. Results also show that politicians respond much more when problem indicators develop negatively than when they develop positively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristensen, Thomas Artmann & Mortensen, Peter Bjerre & Green-Pedersen, Christoffer & Seeberg, Henrik Bech, 2023. "The policy agenda effects of problem indicators: a comparative study in seven countries," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 240-260, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:43:y:2023:i:2:p:240-260_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X22000307/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:43:y:2023:i:2:p:240-260_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.