IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v39y2019i02p235-265_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy accommodation versus electoral turnover: policy representation in Britain, 1945–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Bartle, John
  • Avellaneda, Sebastian Dellepiane
  • McGann, Anthony

Abstract

Does public policy in the United Kingdom respond to changes in public preferences? If so, is this the result of the government changing its policy to reflect preferences (“policy accommodation†) or the result of governments that pursue unpopular policies being replaced at elections by governments more in line with the public (“electoral turnover†)? We explore these questions by estimating annual aggregate public preferences (“the policy mood†) using responses to 287 questions administered 2,087 times and annual policy using budgetary data (“nonmilitary government expenditure†) for the whole of the postwar period. We find that mood moves in the opposite direction to policy and variations in mood are associated with variations in annual vote intentions. Policy is responsive to party control but not directly responsive to mood. Shifts in mood eventually lead to a change in government and thus policy, but this process may be very slow if the public has doubts about the competence of the opposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartle, John & Avellaneda, Sebastian Dellepiane & McGann, Anthony, 2019. "Policy accommodation versus electoral turnover: policy representation in Britain, 1945–2015," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 235-265, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:39:y:2019:i:02:p:235-265_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X18000090/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:39:y:2019:i:02:p:235-265_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.