IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ipe60_60.html

Beyond markets – ‘social institution’ in the work of Arrow and Hurwicz

Author

Listed:
  • Maayan Yeshoron, Yam

Abstract

The paper revisits the place of social institutions in the development of postwar mathematical economics through the work of Kenneth Arrow and Leonid Hurwicz. The rise of formal economic theory is often associated with a turn away from institutions. This paper argues, however, that efforts to bring institutions within the scope of economic analysis were themselves an important dimension of mathematisation. Drawing on published works and archival materials, the paper traces how Arrow and Hurwicz sought to extend economic analysis beyond the competitive market to broader forms of social and economic organisation. Their efforts proceeded through abstraction: by reformulating problems posed in terms of markets and prices as more general problems of information, coordination, communication, and incentives, they developed frameworks within which markets and other institutional arrangements could be represented and compared. The paper thus highlights the conceptual work required to make social institutions into objects of mathematical economic analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Maayan Yeshoron, Yam, 2026. "Beyond markets – ‘social institution’ in the work of Arrow and Hurwicz," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e60_60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137426100897/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e60_60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.