IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ipe57_57.html

A cognitive institutionalist theory of corporate law

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Bruce Bing

Abstract

Existing corporate law theory has largely analysed the corporation through the lenses of agency and contract, leaving its cognitive dimension undertheorised. This article develops a cognitive institutionalist theory of corporate law by integrating legal institutionalism with externalist cognitive science. Corporate cognition arises where routines, interpretive frameworks, and modular information structures process dispersed information within a bounded system and generate judgements that depend on its organisation. The corporation can be understood as a legally constituted cognitive system, with corporate law providing the constitutive infrastructure through which that capacity is formed, attributed, and preserved. This infrastructure comprises three sets of legal mechanisms: legal personality and asset partitioning establish the boundary and interface of the system; the corporate organ structure and its decision rules convert conflicting interpretations into an attributable corporate position; and fiduciary duties supply metacognitive governance, protecting collective decision-making from the epistemic failures inherent in the organisational architecture. Under this framework, doctrines such as veil piercing, the business judgement rule and takeover review are re-examined for their effects on organisational cognition, offering new insights into longstanding scholarly inquiries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Bruce Bing, 2026. "A cognitive institutionalist theory of corporate law," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e57_57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137426100939/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e57_57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.