IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ipe37_37.html

Institutional stickiness through subsidiarity: Germany’s childcare guarantee

Author

Listed:
  • Flowers, Anna Claire

Abstract

Childcare has held a place in national and international policy conversations in recent decades as governments seek to expand economic opportunities for women. Germany has passed several policies towards this end since reunification, including a legal right, or guarantee, for all children to have access to subsidised care. Scholars across disciplines have taken note of the regional patterns that persist in citizens’ uptake of subsidised childcare programmes. This article analyses the patterns through an institutional economics lens, applying Boettke, Coyne, and Leeson’s (2008) institutional stickiness framework to policy changes that have exhibited varying levels of success in former East and West Germany. Subsidiarity acts as a channel for institutional stickiness, allowing local values to shape both the supply of and the demand for public childcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Flowers, Anna Claire, 2026. "Institutional stickiness through subsidiarity: Germany’s childcare guarantee," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-37, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e37_37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137426100654/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e37_37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.