IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ip-_5.html

Social debt and the quasi-contract: the solidarism of Léon Bourgeois as a form of liberal solidarity

Author

Listed:
  • Chassagnon, Virgile
  • Chapas, Benjamin
  • Haned, Naciba

Abstract

This paper studies the ‘liberal solidarity’ of Léon Bourgeois through two fundamental and interlinked ‘liberal solidarist principles’: (i) social debt and (ii) the quasi-contract. No real work has been proposed in economics in English in the context of Bourgeois’s work. It is this shortfall that we wish to fill in this article by restoring a little-known ancient thought and proposing an initial contribution to investigating future avenues of research in institutional economics. The solidarism of the Third French Republic allows us to rethink social democratic liberalism from an open and ongoing view of institutions as the driving force behind both individual rights and the collective order. Bourgeois solidarism is an interesting doctrine for rethinking from a moral perspective the role of human duty in economics and, more largely, in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Chassagnon, Virgile & Chapas, Benjamin & Haned, Naciba, 2026. "Social debt and the quasi-contract: the solidarism of Léon Bourgeois as a form of liberal solidarity," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137425100374/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.