IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ip-_4.html

Property versus possession, ten years on: assessing the lexical impact of the 2015 JOIE debate

Author

Listed:
  • Pietri, Antoine

Abstract

This Comment assesses the legacy of the 2015 JOIE debate, critiquing the economic conflation of de jure ‘property’ and de facto ‘possession’. Citation analysis confirms the debate’s sustained intellectual footprint, but this did not translate into the lexical shift advocated by its proponents. A text-mining analysis of 58 economics journals finds negligible adoption of the specific term ‘possession’. A broader test for a conceptual basket of related de facto terms also fails to find robust evidence; a fragile signal in one dataset, not replicated in a second. We conclude that no significant, profession-wide lexical adoption occurred.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietri, Antoine, 2026. "Property versus possession, ten years on: assessing the lexical impact of the 2015 JOIE debate," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137425100398/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.