IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ip-_28.html

Explaining alliance network in banking industry using isomorphism and tie strength theories

Author

Listed:
  • Hanafizadeh, Payam
  • Khalilzadeh Salmasi, Maryam
  • Ghazinoori, Soroush

Abstract

This study develops a network-level model of banking alliances by integrating neo-institutional isomorphism and tie strength theory. Based on an integrative review of 98 empirical studies and deductive–inductive content analysis, the model explains how institutional pressures and relational mechanisms shape alliance portfolios among interconnected banking actors. The analysis identifies recurring patterns: strong-tie alliances, such as mergers and acquisitions and joint ventures, appear more often under high coercive and normative isomorphism, whereas moderately and loosely coupled alliances, including information sharing and outsourcing, are more common where institutional alignment is weaker and uncertainty is higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanafizadeh, Payam & Khalilzadeh Salmasi, Maryam & Ghazinoori, Soroush, 2026. "Explaining alliance network in banking industry using isomorphism and tie strength theories," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137426100617/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.