IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v22y2026ip-_20.html

Trust in government, institutional quality and the perception of water services

Author

Listed:
  • Dileo, Ivano
  • De Simone, Marco
  • Marzano, Elisabetta

Abstract

This study examines how institutional trust and governance quality shape citizens’ evaluations of water services. Drawing on psychological and institutional theories, we develop a multilevel framework linking individual trust in public authorities to regional governance performance. Using multilevel logistic models and pooled data from the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) Multipurpose Household Survey (2014–2019), combined with a regional Institutional Quality Index, we show that trust in local institutions is the strongest predictor of perceived service quality. At the contextual level, higher government effectiveness and control of corruption are associated with more favourable perceptions. These findings suggest that institutional trust operates as a heuristic under limited observability, while governance conditions shape the context in which such evaluations are formed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dileo, Ivano & De Simone, Marco & Marzano, Elisabetta, 2026. "Trust in government, institutional quality and the perception of water services," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137426100538/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:-_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.