IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v17y2021i5p764-780_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De jure property rights and state capacity: evidence from land specification in the Boer Republics

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitruk, Kara
  • Du Plessis, Sophia
  • Du Plessis, Stan

Abstract

We examine the development of de jure property rights to land by assessing how accurately governments recorded borders of property. We use surveys of farm parcels from two historical states, the Republic of the Orange Free State (OFS) and the South African Republic (ZAR), which are in modern-day South Africa, and employ a descriptive analysis to infer how accurately maps represent parcels of property. We argue that differences in state administrative capacity explains differences in map accuracy and therefore the provision of de jure property rights to land. We find that maps of farms in the ZAR, which had lower administrative capacity, tend to be less accurate than maps of farms in the OFS. Comparisons with military maps compiled under a different administration provide evidence that the costs incurred from previous administrations can limit future attempts to accurately record property. The analysis shows how state administrative capacity can facilitate (or hinder) the provision of property rights to land.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitruk, Kara & Du Plessis, Sophia & Du Plessis, Stan, 2021. "De jure property rights and state capacity: evidence from land specification in the Boer Republics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 764-780, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:17:y:2021:i:5:p:764-780_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137421000266/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:17:y:2021:i:5:p:764-780_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.