IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v16y2020i1p65-82_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Horizontal “checks and balances†in the socialist regime: the party chief and mayor template

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Yang

Abstract

János Kornai's pioneering scholarship examined the mechanisms of the socialist system. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Kornai's main focus was on the transition process in former socialist countries in central Eastern Europe. This paper builds on Kornai's work on the socialist system by analyzing horizontal bargaining within every political branch in contemporary China. I argue that this horizontal bargaining within the party is enhanced by the vertical bargaining. Incorporating Kornai's work on socialism, the “party chief and mayor†template extends the bargaining model from one key figure and one group in the “king and council†template to two key figures and their respective confidants. In addition, it incorporates institutional constraints into the graphical model. It also defines a “collective decision probability function,†which shows how the party chief and mayor model reaches “checks and balances†that limit the policy space, regardless of whether the policy is exogenous or endogenous.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Yang, 2020. "Horizontal “checks and balances†in the socialist regime: the party chief and mayor template," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 65-82, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:65-82_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137418000450/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Zhou, 2022. "Economic institutions and horizontal checks and balances in the Chinese bureaucratic system: evidence at the prefecture-city level," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 133-160, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:65-82_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.