IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v12y2016i04p921-940_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of regulatory accumulation on U.S. Federal District Courts

Author

Listed:
  • RANDOLPH, GREGORY M.
  • FETZNER, JAMES

Abstract

While regulation is increasingly relied upon to address economic and social issues in developed economies, research has yet to examine the impact of the growing use of regulation on the courts. This paper explores the relationship between regulation and criminal judicial enforcement. Data regarding regulatory cases and defendants filed in U.S. district courts and regulation at the U.S. federal level are analyzed. The results suggest that increased reliance on regulation leads to growth in regulatory court cases and defendants filed. These findings imply that the courts continue to play an important role when regulation is employed to address problems and that the courts might experience increasing responsibilities as the use of regulation grows. Additionally, the results suggest that the relationship between regulation and the courts should be considered in the design and implementation of regulation in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Randolph, Gregory M. & Fetzner, James, 2016. "The impact of regulatory accumulation on U.S. Federal District Courts," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 921-940, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:12:y:2016:i:04:p:921-940_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137416000126/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:12:y:2016:i:04:p:921-940_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.