IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v21y1999i01p65-80_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradoxical Fate of the Representative Firm

Author

Listed:
  • Schohl, Frank

Abstract

More than 100 years have passed since Alfred Marshall introduced the representative firm to economic theory in 1891. During this long period of time, many arguments have been raised giving either support or opposition to the concept. In recent years, macroeconomists have taken an increasing interest in the representative firm. Since the beginning of the modern microfoundations literature in the early 1970s, the representative firm and its big brother, the representative agent, have been made essential analytical tools for linking macroeconomics and microeconomics. Within this debate, the microfoundation of business cycle theory has played a prominent role.

Suggested Citation

  • Schohl, Frank, 1999. "The Paradoxical Fate of the Representative Firm," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 65-80, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:21:y:1999:i:01:p:65-80_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837200002856/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Persefoni Tsaliki & Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2015. "Classical Economists, Marx and Marshall on Dominant Technique," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 21-36.
    2. Antonella Stirati, 2013. "Sraffa's 1930 manuscripts on the representative firm and Marshall's theory of value and business profit," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 439-465, June.
    3. Aoki, Masanao & Hawkins, Raymond J., 2010. "Non-self-averaging and the statistical mechanics of endogenous macroeconomic fluctuations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1543-1546, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:21:y:1999:i:01:p:65-80_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.