IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v7y1972i01p1321-1341_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Odd-Lot Trading in the Stock Market and Its Market Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Hsiu-Kwang

Abstract

By examining the annual data from 1937-1967, we found that odd-lot volume has become loss important in the market in recent years. Although the odd-lot trading volume has increased steadily in the absolute term since the end of World War II, the share of odd-lot trading in relation to total round-lot volume has been declining. By 1967, the percentage of odd-lot volume to round-lot total sales was down to 11.6 percent. The same data also indicate that odd-lot short sales have increased moderately since 1962; however, the volume is quite insignificant. The average of odd-lot short sales to total round-lot short sales for the 31-year period is only 1.9 percent. Odd-lotters were also found to be net purchasers during this period (1937-1967); however, odd-lotters have turned into net sellers in recent years. The total net sales from 1961 to 1967 amounted to 22.2 million shares, which is approximately 25 percent of the total net purchases of the entire period (1937-1967).

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Hsiu-Kwang, 1972. "Odd-Lot Trading in the Stock Market and Its Market Impact," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1321-1341, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:7:y:1972:i:01:p:1321-1341_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000017397/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davis, Ryan L. & Roseman, Brian S. & Van Ness, Bonnie F. & Van Ness, Robert, 2017. "1-share orders and trades," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 109-117.
    2. Thanos Verousis & Pietro Perotti & Georgios Sermpinis, 2018. "One size fits all? High frequency trading, tick size changes and the implications for exchanges: market quality and market structure considerations," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 353-392, February.
    3. Robert T. Daigler & Bruce D. Fielitz, 1981. "A Multiple Discriminant Analysis Of Technical Indicators On The New York Stock Exchange," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 4(3), pages 169-182, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:7:y:1972:i:01:p:1321-1341_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.